Ad Seeks 'Beautiful Ladies' To Seduce Businessmen For Insider Trading Info

Backpage seductive woman insider secrets

The crassness of the ad was stunning: "Do you have an open mind, a sense of adventure and the desire to make some serious cash? We're a group that specializes in extracting key pieces of information from business leaders by seducing them with beautiful ladies such as yourself."

The ad -- posted in the "adult jobs" section of classified ads -- says it will pay $5,000 to $20,000 for information obtained, and is looking for "beautiful, sophisticated ladies who will do anything it takes."

Backpage is no stranger to controversy; last year, the website was accused of facilitating the trafficking of children, leading the Goldman Sachs Group Inc. to divest from Village Voice media, which then owned the site, Reuters reported. But this ad seems to be stepping over some line. Surely it was illegal?

More: Sign Up For AOL Jobs' Newsletter

In keeping with their policies, neither the U.S. Attorney's Office nor the Securities Exchange Commission would comment on whether they are investigating the matter.

But Alan Kaufman, a partner in the New York office of the international law firm Kelley, Drye & Warren LLP specializing in white collar crime, told AOL Jobs that the "open and blatant situation of women being paid money to launch romantic relationships to extract information is ... unique." Most often, Kaufman said, the insider information is revealed during consensual romantic relations. And the courts have a history of ruling that kind of conduct illegal.

For instance, in the case U.S. vs. Gansman, James Gansman was accused of tipping off his mistress, Donna Murdoch, telling her about some mergers and acquisitions that his employer, Ernst & Young LLP, had planned. Thanks to trading on the insider information, she reportedly raked in about $390,000.

In 2009, Gansman was convicted on six counts of securities fraud, and in 2011 the ruling was upheld after an appeal. Murdoch faced 15 counts of securities fraud, Bloomberg reported, and took a plea bargain that put her on two years of probation.

"There are any number of cases in which information was tipped during 'pillow talk' that resulted in conviction," Kaufman said, and so paying "women who are going to do exactly that" would presumably lead to a similar result.

But, as notes, the case may not be airtight. The act of insider trading is not itself expressly prohibited by U.S. law. Instead, convictions usually result from an interpretation of SEC Rule 10b-5 which outlines fraud. For insider trading to qualify, the alleged insider trading would have to feature both the disclosure of private material, as well as a financial benefit for the person leaking the information.

In other words, if private financial information was shared accidentally, and brought no financial benefit to its source, the act might not be illegal under this SEC rule.

So if the targeted businessman in the BackPage ad "thinks he is just blowing off steam about a business deal to a one-night stand who was going to sleep with him anyway," said CNBC senior editor John Carney, "this entire scheme wouldn't violate any insider trading rules."

BackPage ad

Don't Miss: Companies Hiring Now

More From AOL Jobs

Looking for a job? Click here to get started.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum


Filter by:

Wow, I guess I was wrong. Obama IS creating jobs!

January 27 2013 at 11:16 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

but the congress can do all of this and get rich bu no one else

January 27 2013 at 11:11 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Yes this is the same agency where Mata Hari worked.

January 27 2013 at 6:51 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

I guess, as long as they don't break the official rules on lying and cheating then they will be OK

January 27 2013 at 5:18 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

LIke this is something new....please. And everybody does this every day. This is human nature and manipulation for advantage. And don't think that you are the exception. It may not be sex, it could be cupcakes, or religious guilt.. It's manipulation. Also, Larry, "swallow" has had different meanings in intelligence parlance (CIA and former KGB). You might be thinking of a "honeytrap". But then again, I don't know what you're really thinking, do I?

January 26 2013 at 3:39 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Well at least the politictions in Washington don't have to worry as none of them have any useful information or even common sence. Plus most of them are to old to get the job done anyway.

January 26 2013 at 3:04 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Larry Hively

Oddly enough that is what the CIA refers to as a "swallow".

January 26 2013 at 2:20 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Cause we all know the U.S. never uses sanctioned prostitures, right?

January 26 2013 at 2:00 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Not a real deal here. There are many women getting that remuneration presently, and they don't travel or have expenses. And they can several ' employers ' at the same time.

January 25 2013 at 12:58 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Search Articles

Picks From the Web