Rachel Walsh, Mother of Baby With Cancer, Sues Barclays For $10 Million

 (Courtesy of Rachel Walsh)

By Alan Farnham

A young mother whose baby was born with cancer claims that Barclays Capital fired her after an extended leave of absence, at which time Barclays canceled her child's health coverage. Barclays, she says, contested her eligibility for unemployment, forcing her to draw down her savings to support herself and her baby.

Now Rachel Walsh, 32, is filing a complaint alleging breach of contract and gender discrimination, and demanding $10 million in damages and compensation.

Because Walsh, as part of her employment agreement with Barclays, waived her right to trial, her claim will be arbitrated by FINRA, The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

Her attorney, Walker Harman, Jr., of New York says of Barclays: "I thought surely they would want to settle, because this case has such dramatic and disturbing facts -- and a claimant about whom there are no bad facts."

More: Sign Up For AOL Jobs' Newsletter

Walsh graduated from St. John's University in 2004 with a GPA of 3.7. She holds an MBA with a concentration in tax and accounting. According to Harmon, she has never been accused of misconduct.

She started her career at Ernst & Young in 2004, then worked for Merrill Lynch in their global tax department. From there, she says, she was recruited to Barclays in 2010 to be assistant vice president of global finance.

She tells ABC News that the hours were sometimes long. When tax deadlines loomed, her day might start at 8:30 a.m. and end at 11 p.m.

She became pregnant late in 2010 -- the same year, according to her complaint, that Barclays gave her a raise, a bonus and a positive year-end review.

Walsh kept working until about three weeks before her due date, when, according to her attorney, her doctor prescribed bed rest because of serious complications with her pregnancy. During that time she was on disability, thus still covered by health insurance.

On May 5, 2011, she gave birth to a son, and began her paid, 12-week maternity leave.

A month later, according to her complaint, her baby was diagnosed with bilateral retinoblastoma-cancer in the retinas of both eyes. The boy was referred to Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center for treatment.

Walsh says that she informed Barclays about her son's cancer. She kept them posted on his progress and asked that she be allowed to take additional leave time, following the expiration of her maternity leave. Barclays agreed to additional unpaid leave.

More: Victoria's Secret Angel Constance Jablonski Sued By Former Modeling Agency

Under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, eligible employees of covered employers are entitled to 12 workweeks of leave in a 12-month period, if they need the leave to give birth to a child, care for a newborn, or to care for a child with a serious health condition. Walsh's attorney does not contend that Barclays failed, in Walsh's case, to honor that requirement.

At first, says Walsh, her superiors sounded understanding and supportive. She was told, she says, that the bank would have a position for her when she was able to return, and that she could then begin by working from home or on a flexible schedule. She and Barclays signed a contract to that effect, according to her complaint.

Did she have any sense there might be trouble coming? "No," she tells ABC News. "I had a sense of security during my leave. I was so thankful. They seemed so understanding. They told me I could work from home. I had insurance for my son."

Her son's chemotherapy wrapped up in the spring of 2012, and, in early August, she told Barclays that she was ready to resume work -- on a flextime basis, if possible.

One of her bosses told her that she (the boss) opposed Walsh's going back into the same position that she had held before, owing to the heavy workload and deadlines associated with it. "She said she would not feel comfortable because of nights where I might have to be at the hospital with my son."

This impressed Walsh as sexist.

"She was assuming that because I was the mother," she explains, "I would be the one who would have to sacrifice; that I would not be able to come to work. But if I had been a man, I don't think my boss would have assumed that. Actually, my fiancee had taken a flexible job, so that he could be there for the baby."

More: Attorney Kate Baker Alleges Boss Bullied Her Into Staying Single, Childless

Attorney Harman calls Barclays' assumption "shocking, morally abhorrent, and clearly sexist."

This turn of events left Walsh very upset. Desperate to work, according to her complaint, she told Barclays that she would go into any position the bank could find for her. The bank eventually responded that no positions -- either part-time or full-time -- were available, and that Walsh was no longer a "fit" for the group with whom she used to work.

"They said they had nothing available, and that I would be losing all my benefits. I was not expecting that."

Barclays, Britain's No. 2 bank, has been in the spotlight for its role in the interest-rate rigging scandal that had bankers conspiring to report false lending rates for an index known as Libor. More than $1 trillion in mortgages are tied to the rate. Last year, the bank was fined $360 million by U.S. regulators for its role in the scheme. A day later, CEO Bob Diamond resigned his post.

Barclays, responding to a request for comment from ABC News, says in a statement: "Barclays is committed to working with its employees to accommodate health and family needs that may arise, including accommodating leaves of absence for pregnancies and child care. Ms. Walsh requested, and Barclays approved, several requests for extended leave -- beyond the time periods that would be required by law. During her extended leave, Barclays provided Ms. Walsh and her family continued health coverage benefits. Thereafter, Ms. Walsh declined to return to a full-time position that the firm had available for her."

Attorney Harman says Barclays' assertion that Walsh declined a full-time position is "patently untrue," and that he has recordings to prove it.

Walsh, he says, recorded phone conversations with Barclays HR personnel in which they state not just that no full-time position is available, but that no position at all is available. "They offered her nothing, and told her nothing was available. I have concrete evidence of that," he says.

Walsh exited the company September 6. From the beginning of her maternity leave until then, Barclays had continued paying a portion of Walsh's health insurance.

She managed to get replacement health coverage for her son via COBRA, but at a cost to her of $1,800 a month. "With no income, that was very difficult." When she applied for unemployment insurance, Barclays contested her eligibility, though eventually she got it.

Asked how she has paid her bills since leaving the bank, she says, "I've been living off my savings. Before this, I'd been saving for the down-payment on a home. I exhausted that, but I've had help from my family. And my fiancee has helped."

How's her son? "He's doing well," Walsh says. "He's 20 months old now. He's got a checkup tomorrow. He has to be treated every two weeks." The form of pediatric cancer that he has is fast-growing initially but slows with age. By age 7, she says, her son ought to be cancer-free. "He's been through a lot," says the mom. "He started chemo at 7 weeks old. But he's very strong, very tough. We'll get through it."

As for what the future holds for Walsh herself, she tells ABC News: "As far as work, I've been looking. I put a lot of hours into my career, trying to get ahead. Hopefully I can continue."

Watch More News Videos at ABC | Technology News | Celebrity News

Don't Miss: Companies Hiring Now

More From ABC News

Looking for a job? Click here to get started.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum


Filter by:

if she had married her 'fiance', THEIR child would have been covered under his health insurance had she the need or desire to be a stay at home mom.
this is just a get rich quick money grab.

January 19 2013 at 10:36 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

I believe this is NOT a US Bank, but a British Bank where they have Socialized Medicine.

January 19 2013 at 9:30 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

She should have taken her full time job back as agreed---when she refused that then all bets were off

January 19 2013 at 9:25 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to gblank1603's comment

Re-read..she signed a contract stating she could go back with a flexible schedule that the bank reneged on, not her. I hope she gets every penny of the $10 mil she's asking for.

January 19 2013 at 9:38 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply

If they treat their employees like that, imagine how they treat their customers.

January 19 2013 at 9:06 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Vartra Antonelli

I don't see how the boss' comment about her needing to be at the hospital for her son are sexist. I would expect that with cancer so close to the brain, BOTH parents would be going with the child to every hospital and doctor visit.

January 19 2013 at 8:41 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Barclays is crazy for not settling the suit. Do they want this dragged out to air their dirty laundry?
Women don't have as much rights as they should have.
Every person on the planet had a mother who carried the pregnancy. Even for a surrogate mother, the pregnancy was carried.
Women's reproduction rights must be protected.

January 19 2013 at 8:30 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Cindy's comment

Has othing to do with her right to reproduce..you're on the wrong site for yiur response...

January 19 2013 at 9:40 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Gerard M

maybe if we had a system like england, canada and france we would not have to go through this bulls**t. these conservatives idiots all preach about the family and family values and christianity, but they don't do anything to help the american family, they are pro-life but once that child is born, they could give a **** about it, you are on your own, that's what you get for fornicating. these bible thumpers are the lowest of the low, they talk a good game but fall VERY short of being anything christian like. you don't treat people like this.

January 19 2013 at 8:13 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Gerard M's comment

Maybe if they had the system we have they wouldn't flock here ior better treatment and shorter waits to be see and treated.

January 19 2013 at 9:42 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

I hope she gets lots and lots of money!!

January 19 2013 at 6:57 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Paul MacLeod

since I can only read one side of this story, I won't be able to degrade Barclay as much as I want to . let's just say that they are a bunch of low down dirty rotten scum bags.. and leave it at that until more evidence comes out..

January 19 2013 at 6:54 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply

Someone should take the CEO out to the woosshed and kick his ass!

January 19 2013 at 6:10 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply

Search Articles

Picks From the Web