Popular Small Business Bill Hits Senate Obstacles

small business bill Senate obstacleBy Jim Abrams

WASHINGTON -- It might seem like a recipe for success: Legislation to help small businesses raise capital passed the House last week with 95 percent of lawmakers voting for it and President Barack Obama's support. But in today's Congress, nothing comes easily.

Since the House vote, the head of the agency that oversees financial markets has voiced concerns that the bill would weaken protections for would-be investors in startup companies. Now that the bill is on the Senate floor, Democratic opponents are warning of repeats of the Enron and dot-com debacles.

Also complicating the legislation's prospects is a Democratic attempt to link it to extending the Export-Import Bank and expanding the amount of money it can lend. Some conservatives would like to eliminate the agency.

"They want to pick a fight rather than get this bill to the president's desk," Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky said Thursday of the Democratic moves.

The bill's Republican promoters in the House refer to it as the JOBS Act. It would exempt small businesses and startups from some Securities and Exchange Commission regulations, making it easier and less costly for them to raise capital and go public.

Among the six smaller bills combined in the House package, one creates a new emerging growth company classification that phases in SEC regulations over five years. Another removes SEC restrictions on "crowdfunding," the raising of capital from a larger pool of small-scale investors.

Both the White House and lawmakers welcomed the steps as ways to remove red tape and thus lead to job creation.

But SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro this week presented Senate Banking Committee leaders with a list of concerns. The bill's definition of an emerging growth company is so broad "that it would eliminate important protections for investors in even very large companies, including those with up to $1 billion in annual revenue," she said.

Schapiro also said the provision on crowdfunding "needs additional safeguards to protect investors from those who may seek to engage in fraudulent activities."

Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois, the second-ranking Senate Democrat, was more direct: "Let's call this crowdfunding for what it is. It is Internet gambling, and the odds will never favor the investor."

He said the "so-called jobs bill creates a job opportunity for any individual salesman to set up shop with a barstool and a laptop computer."

"They can be selling worthless stock for phantom companies," Durbin said.

Supporters of the crowdfunding provision, which allows companies to raise up to $1 million a year through registered Internet websites, insist it provides adequate investor protections.

Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) says a bipartisan crowdfunding bill he has introduced in the Senate does offer investor protections while creating a way for investors to pool their resources to fund promising new ventures. But he faulted the bill as it came out of the House, saying it allows companies to raise money without providing financial information. "That is not an investment market; that is a scam," he said.

Merkley also said that under the House bill companies would not have to go through a registered intermediary when setting up a website seeking investors.

The Coalition for Sensible Safeguards, an alliance of normally Obama-friendly labor, good-government and consumer advocacy groups, is urging the bill's defeat. "This ill-advised measure would roll back financial safeguards that were put in place to prevent the kind of fraud and abuse we saw during the Enron scandal, the dot-com bust and the recent mortgage meltdown and financial collapse," it said.

White House press spokeswoman Amy Brundage, in a statement Wednesday, repeated that there were numerous elements of the legislation that Obama had espoused as part of his proposals to help small businesses. But she added that Obama supports efforts by Senate Democrats to both find common ground with the House bill "while also improving the House bill to ensure there are sufficient safeguards to prevent abuse and protect investors."

She added that the White House supports reauthorization of the Export-Import Bank.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid announced Thursday that the Senate would vote next Tuesday on whether to take up two amendments dealing with investor protections and the bank. Both would require 60 votes to advance. The investor protection measure, backed by Durbin, is likely to face strong GOP resistance and be voted down. But many Republican allies in the business community, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, support extension of the Ex-Im Bank, and the outcome of that vote is less certain.

The self-financed bank helps U.S. companies sell abroad by providing credit financing and loans to foreign customers. Washington Democratic Sen. Maria Cantwell, sponsor of the amendment, said that in the 2011 budget year the bank's financing supported $41 billion in U.S. exports from more than 3,600 American companies and helped maintain almost 290,000 jobs.

She said that over the past three years financing from the bank had also supported export sales of more than 460 commercial aircraft from Boeing Co., based in her state.

Her measure would extend the life of the bank, set to expire at the end of May, for four years and raise the lending cap from $100 billion, which the bank is expected to hit in the coming weeks, to $140 billion.

"Allowing the Ex-Im Bank to expire would be a crippling blow to our export economy," she said.

The bank has long been a target of conservative groups who say it picks winners and losers and distorts markets. Both the Club for Growth and Heritage Action urged senators to vote against the amendment and reminded them that their vote would go on their annual scorecards of how lawmakers vote on key issues.

Laena Fallon, spokeswoman for House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.), said it was unfortunate that Reid was "choosing to add unrelated provisions and needlessly delay the JOBS bill that passed the House with 390 bipartisan votes and was supported by the president."

She said the House was working on a separate Ex-Im Bank bill that would include reforms in how the bank operates and that lawmakers hope to get that bill to the House floor by the end of March. Cantor was the main force behind the small business bill package.

Next: U.S. Factories Help Job Recovery Endure In March

Don't Miss: Companies Hiring Now

Stories from Daily Finance

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum


Filter by:
Mack Kellett

the dems killing more jobs

March 17 2012 at 12:30 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Obama and the dems dont want small busines they want big goverment busines so they can run it,

March 16 2012 at 11:48 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply

Obama and the dems dont want small busines, They want big goverment busines so the goverment can control it, GET RID OF OBAMA IN 2012.

March 16 2012 at 11:43 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Just wait, Harry will come out and say it's the republican's like he always does. The same old song and dance!

March 16 2012 at 11:03 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
Thrift Store

Leave it to the Democrats to try and change the bill and screw things up for small business owners who by the way employ the most Americans . The Democrats are Anti Business period (Unless your a Union) If you want to stay unemplyed or become unemplyed withing the next cpl of years then by all means vote Democrat

March 16 2012 at 10:55 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply

it is a good thing because anything the gov is involved with is not good for anybody

March 16 2012 at 10:26 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to orayfoster's comment

If we hate our government of, by and for the people, how is that productive? Government brought us the Internet!

March 16 2012 at 10:58 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Republicans want "No Rules" Government so they (or their Elitist Cronnies) don't have to worry about being caught causing harm to our Citizens or the integrity of the Nation.

March 16 2012 at 9:17 PM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply

Once again the Democrats show that they have no interest in job growth. First the thousands that could have been employed on the Canadian pipeline and now this. Our country must vote for a new administration or no one will have a job.

March 16 2012 at 8:05 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Phil's comment

How novel! A post composed of Democrat bashing . . . . blanket statements such as yours lack facts. Are you qualified to understand the possible financial downside of this legislation? I think caution and investigation would be advisable after the latest global recession we experienced, and extrapolating that the Democrats are anti-job growth is ridiculous.

Also, here are the disputed job creation figures for the Keystone XL pipeline: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505123_162-57361212/keystone-pipeline-how-many-jobs-really-at-stake/

Simplistic all or nothing thinking solves nothing and promotes ignorance, not informed consensus.

March 17 2012 at 1:24 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Harry Reid does not like any jobs making bill that does not have the blessing and approval of the unions.
No unions...no jobs, according to the Dems.
Screw the public.

March 16 2012 at 6:39 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply

yup,, the dems aren't getting enough cash as usual..good old Reid and his cronies want the startups to pony up and bring in the unions every chance they get...

March 16 2012 at 6:00 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Search Articles

Picks From the Web