Employee Can Keep $27,000 Overpayment, Court Says

overpaid woman keeps moneyWorkers who get overpaid because of an accounting error usually find they have to pay the money back.

But in Australia, a court has ruled that an employee of a recruiting company can keep about $27,000 paid to her in error because the overpayment prevented her from getting unemployment payments.

Victoria Supreme Court overturned a bid by TRA Global to retrieve the $27,318.48 (about $26,739 in the U.S.) that it overpaid former national operations manager Vesna Kebakoska because it would be "inequitable," the Australian news site news.com.au reports.

Kebakoska reported the payment to the federal agency responsible for issuing unemployment payments. In doing so, she was denied jobless benefits.

The amount Kebakoska received was equal to 12 weeks of her annual $129,000 salary, according to the report. TRA Global issued the payment in July 2008, when Kebakoska was laid off, because the company mistakenly believed it was obligated to do so under federal rules.

But the court found that the former employee shouldn't bear a financial loss that she wouldn't have suffered had the company not made the mistake.

Chalk one up for the little guy.


Next: Manufacturer Fined After Worker Killed By Giant Blender







Stories from CNNMoney

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

12 Comments

Filter by:
Riturocks

NIce post david:)
http://www.tamilmoviesonline.co.in

October 10 2011 at 6:00 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Michael Keohane

A "Daniel" has come to judge us. Innocent mistakes in paying people cannot be corrected. Would the judge found the same if the company had underpaid? What should have happened is that the woman should have returned the money and the government pay the withheld unemployment benefits. Everyone, in this manner, ends up in the same position as if the error in payment was never made. This is justice & equity not judicial activism.

October 08 2011 at 6:42 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
jrp1947

No employee should be required to repay any salary/work overpayment if fraud was not invovled. If the company made the mistake and it was not a conspiracy between the issuing authority and the employee then the company should be made to learn from it's mistake. If the employee is an inncoent partcipant then they should not be held acountable for the company's mistake.

October 08 2011 at 12:35 AM Report abuse -3 rate up rate down Reply
BEWARE.. HUNTERS

Good not her fault the company hired an accounting idiot.

October 07 2011 at 11:51 PM Report abuse -3 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to BEWARE.. HUNTERS's comment
chapython

I understand now. If you mistakenly overpaid for an item, then you would not want the mistake corrected. Good for you.

October 07 2011 at 11:58 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
me

The US is going the way of IRAN!

October 07 2011 at 9:35 PM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to me's comment
tony

Hellll u mean?

October 08 2011 at 3:02 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
drbracket

Australia so much more advanced then us . Maybe they are conservative free ?

October 07 2011 at 9:15 PM Report abuse -5 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to drbracket's comment
blckblt96

Sounds like just the opposite.

October 07 2011 at 10:32 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
HELLO MEANLADY

Amen that's what justice looks like.

October 07 2011 at 7:23 PM Report abuse -3 rate up rate down Reply
bas142128

~~~ GREAT, ONE FOR THE UNDER DOG FOR A CHANGE !

October 07 2011 at 7:16 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
Nuclear Nemesis

I make it more like 11 weeks pay. If this is as accurate as a writer covering news for AOL's Daily Finance can get, no wonder the US is in trouble.

October 07 2011 at 6:01 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply

Search Articles

Top Companies Hiring

Week of Nov 9 - Nov 16
View All

Picks From the Web