Amy-Erin Blakely Busts Devereux Foundation with Large Breasts Lawsuit

Gloria Allred is a blood ******* man hater. Amy Erin looks like a freaking man. And really sorry, but she was 'ashamed of her body' when people were commenting on how nice her tittles were? yeah...we are all buying that one. These kind of horseshiiit lawsuits are what make filing legitimate lawsuits so difficult for 'actual' victims.

There is a case against Devereux. I was a patient at the Devereux in Pine Hills Florida. I believe that there is discrimination from this place. I was there for 7 months. I was attacked by two of the girls two days in a row (a Friday and Saturday) that I lived on a pod with, and when the staff finally decided to break it up, I wanted to call the police because I was in fear of my life and they told me that if I called I would be punished. I spent 7 months there being over medicated, and having no help.

I love the breasts. Plump and firm. To hold one in each hand, preparing to enjoy them. Poke and prod them...right before throwing them in the pan at 375....Ahh...chicken. What were you thinking I meant?

Zach---

You couldn't be more wrong!

It's not productive at all to HER to file the lawsuit. Sexual Harassment Lawsuits never have a personal gain. The only gain is making a change for that company and setting the example.

Whatever monetary awards she will get as damages, the company is also required by law to pay a very large percentage of the TOTAL damages awarded to whatever specific population they damaged as a result of the harassment. That's why it's so interesting that the company itself is harassing her because she is a woman, when they are in place to protect the rights of women.

Whatever you believe, whatever the outcome, whatever her work ethic or record, she is no longer hirable by any company because of this lawsuit. Not legally....but no one hires a person who files a complaint or lawsuit against a company. She is a woman in her...what? 30's? 40's?---too old to start over by going back to school for a career change, and too young to retire, and too far into the center of life to wait it out for a better day, which because of the lawsuit will never happen.

Even if she wins...the few measly pennies she gets from her part of the TOTAL damages awarded will just barely be enough to maintain the lifestyle she has had for a few years until she can find another job. There is no personal gain even if she is just trying to retaliate as a disgruntled employee.

Also , no one "hinted" anything. They flat out told her in every limited disgusting way they could think of.
These were the actual complaints....didn't you read any of the article?
• She was told that other employees complained that they could not concentrate in meetings because all they saw were her "big breasts."
• Someone in management talked about how large her breasts were and that she needed to "hide them."
• She learned that she had been nicknamed "Big Tittie Baby."
• She learned that someone in management wanted to sit next to her "so he can look at her big titties" and that he "loves big titties."
• She was also told that a high level executive asked to play tennis with her so that he could watch her in her tennis skirt and "see her big titties bouncing around."
• A false allegation was circulated that Ms. Blakely attended a board meeting where she was a presenter with her "boobs hanging out." In fact she had worn a brown turtleneck sweater and a jacket to the meeting.
• She was told by management "you have very large breasts -- so does my wife, and I have talked to her about you and your breasts."
• She was also told that "you should wear loose fitting clothes or try to hide your breasts because they are too distracting."
• She was told that she was "too sensual" for further advancement to the position of executive director

Now as far the reason she was fired....I find it a little more than odd that this company had no problem with her for 13 years, promotion after promotion, raise after raise, performance review after performance review, and then after 13 years when she complained that someone made an inappropriate comment---she was fired because her claims were "either spurious or twisted in content and context to be deliberately inflammatory." Whatever attitude she had before then or shortly before then...wouldn't you have been a little uncomfortable if your company created a hostile work environment for you?

No offense, but no one here gives a rat's ass about your father or his credentials or what you obviously do not know about the legal system. There is never a winner in any discrimination case based on race, gender, sex, age, medical condition, religion or anything else. I have to wonder about all the people who first filed cases because they were black, Jewish, gay, pregnant, or had AIDS and think that if they were only in it for personal gain then we would have one seriously F**ed-up country right now. It's never easy to prove, but the point is to give awareness to the situation and create a building block in the right direction. Everyone takes a hit, not just the specific victim, but moreover, each population affected by discrimination. Whatever is decided on this case, women will be both negatively and positively affected in the workplace based on the outcome for years. I seriously doubt that all these comments went completely unnoticed by anyone else in the work place, whether or not they agree with her, and I don't believe at all that she was the only one that was offended. She is more than likely just the first to publicly say something.

Tourette's Syndrome? You have

There seems to be a fundamental misunderstanding on the board - or at least by "Thinkbeforeyouspeak"...

Comments which are welcomed or do not cause the recipient to fee offended when said, so matter how lewd, do not fit the definition of harassment. An essential element of harassment is the behavior was not welcome or was offensive TO THE RECIPIENT. It doesn't matter if everyone else in the world would have found the behavior offensive if the recipient didn't then it's not harassing to them and thus, not harassment. This doesn't mean a company couldn't or wouldn't punish someone under the guise of "sexual harassment" or even fire them for it. What this means is that courts require evidence of conduct being unwelcome at the time it was done - not afterward when there's something to be gained by being offended. Hell, of course she's offended now, her complaint depends on it.

What this means, is that whatever was said to this woman, if it wasn't offensive to HER WHEN IT WAS SAID then then it wasn't (public law) harassment. She can't come back after being fired and say oh, by the way, I was harassed even though I brought the behavior on and welcomed it myself now I've lost my job let's reassess things. Perhaps it worked for her to flaunt her boobs then and she'd trying to make it work for her to call their reaction to her behavior harassment now she's lost her job. Basic opportunistic behavior IF that's what she'd doing - the court will decide.

It's a grown up world and we're all discriminated against for something or other.

The Devereux Foundation offers the BEST residential care for challenged people all over this country. What concerns me the most is that if money is won by Erin and her attorney,the residents at Devereux will be the ones to suffer. Why should any monies go to their own personal advancements-what a double standard! As a professional in the mental health field, why would she put ANY sum of money in her own pocket and that of her attorney? Regretably, Erin and her attorney are more concerned with monetary gains for themselves,than the impact they will have on those less fortunate than ourselves.The ramifications extend beyond the present lawsuit and will impact these clients in a multitude of scenarios. It is really unforgivable to take from those unable to defend themselves.

I come from a family of very flat chested women; until me. I was shapd (literally) like Sophia Loren. There was nothing I could do no matter how hard I tried. I was told I was a sexpot, that I should be out there getting it nightly and getting paid, my whole family called me a slut/whore because of my breasts. I did not wear revealing clothing and was very conscious. No person should be made to feel less for their looks in any way, shape or form regardless of their size or facial features. Many times I was threatened also if I was fat, if I was thin, why can't you get those things out of the way. We're expected to act the way we are treated because many have a preconceived nothing that women with large breasts are easy and sleep around. What are we supposed to do, cut them off?

Unfortunately, the fashions, at this time, have not helped matters at all. It is presumed that all women wear the same type of clothing and have a mentality of ready to serve for sexual reasons.

I am not trying to offend anyone, just give an opinion.

Yeah right! She has more manly features than feminine features! Cut ne a break!

As an attractive, large-breasted woman I have to say that I am sick to death about being judged by my appearance. The problem is, when you have a curvy figure, ANYTHING you wear is going to look sensual. Unless you put the woman in very loose-fitting clothes or a sack, and that just plain looks unprofessional as well, as well as completely unflattering. If you have breasts you have them, and men are going to be aware of them. Honestly, I think men really need to grow up. We ALL get that you like breasts, but when you are at work you need to maintain a level of professionalism toward your coworkers. That means no discussing your coworkers' physical attributes and no commenting on them to the coworker in question. Management should punish boors who behave this way by demoting them, instead it's completely ignored and the WOMAN is told to conform. DISGUSTING.

This woman is out of her mind, you should display some decorum in the workplace. This suit should never even see a courtroom. But,leave it to money/camera hungry Gloria to march her ridiculous case right up the court steps. Gloria hurts women more than she helps. When people hire her, they automatically lose credit with me. If this woman's outfits at work are anything like the one she has on in the interview, then she is completely in the wrong. When you are working with children and families on a daily basis, you should remember that when you get dressed. Are you that slutty that you need to parade you "fat rolls", not curves, in front of children and co-workers.
Well,she got the attention she wanted.This is just another example of a low-class,trashy, white woman who gets off on flattering herself. When you are fat "curvy" whatever....you should dress accordingly. Not every outfit is for everyBODY! As she was obtaining all of those degrees, she should have noticed that real business women who want to be taken seriously know how to rock a power-suit. Everyone was staring at her "train wreck" wardrobe-so it was distracting whether too small or low cut--Distracting and Unprofessional! Wear that to the club.
I also have noticed that women who think they are too hot to trot-tend to be the ugliest inside and out.