Christopher Leonard, AP
In a brutal job market, here's a task that might sound easy: Fill jobs in nursing, engineering and energy research that pay $55,000 to $60,000, plus benefits.
Yet even with 15 million people hunting for work, even with the unemployment rate nearing 10 percent, some employers can't find enough qualified people for good-paying career jobs.
Ask Steve Jones, a hospital recruiter in Indianapolis who's struggling to find qualified nurses, pharmacists and MRI technicians. Or Ed Baker, who's looking to hire at a U.S. Energy Department research lab in Richland, Wash., for $60,000 each.
Economists say the main problem is a mismatch between available work and people qualified to do it. Millions of jobs with attractive pay and benefits that once drew legions of workers to the auto industry, construction, Wall Street and other sectors are gone, probably for good. And those who lost those jobs generally lack the right experience for new positions popping up in health care, energy and engineering.
Many of these specialized jobs were hard to fill even before the recession. But during downturns, recruiters tend to become even choosier, less willing to take financial risks on untested workers.
The mismatch between job opening and job seeker is likely to persist even as the economy strengthens and begins to add jobs. It also will make it harder for the unemployment rate, now at 9.8 percent, to drop down to a healthier level.
"Workers are going to have to find not just a new company, but a new industry," said Sophia Koropeckyj, managing director of Moody's Economy.com. "A fifty-year-old guy who has been screwing bolts into the side of a car panel is not going to be able to become a health care administrator overnight."
It's become especially hard to find accountants, health care workers, software sales representatives, actuaries, data analysts, physical therapists and electrical engineers, labor analysts say. And employers that demand highly specialized training – like biotech firms that need plant scientists or energy companies that need geotechnical engineers to build offshore platforms – struggle even more to fill jobs.
The trend has been intensified by the speed of the job market decline, Koropeckyj said. The nation has lost a net 7.6 million jobs since the recession began in December 2007. Yet it can take a year or more for a laid-off worker to gain the training and education to switch industries. That means health care jobs are going unfilled even as laid-off workers in the auto, construction or financial services industries seek work.
"So we have this army of the unemployed" without the necessary skills, Koropeckyj said.
Sitting in his office overlooking the Clarian Health complex, Jones leafed through some of the applications he's received. One came from a hotel worker who listed his experience as, "Cleaning rooms; make beds, clean tubes, vacuum." Another was from a fitness instructor whose past duties included signing up gym members.
Many of the jobless seem to be applying for any opening they see, Jones said.
"You just don't have the supply to fill those particular positions," he said of the more than 200 "critical" jobs he needs to fill at Clarian, including nurses, pharmacists, MRI technicians and ultrasound technologists.
Contributing to the problem is that in a tough economy, employers take longer to assess applicants and make a hiring decision. By contrast, "in a healthier economy, you don't wait around for the perfect person," said Lawrence Katz, a professor of labor economics at Harvard.
To be sure, employers in most sectors of the economy are having no trouble filling jobs – especially those, like receptionists, hotel managers or retail clerks, that don't require specialized skills.
But as more jobs vanish for good, the gap between the unemployed and the requirements of today's job openings is widening. Throughout the economy, an average of six people now compete for each job opening – the highest ratio on government records dating to 2000.
Sifting through applications for jobs at the U.S. Energy Department's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in Washington state, Baker said he sees "people that have worked in other areas, and now they're trying to apply that skill set to the energy arena."
"Unfortunately, that's not the skill set we need."
The jobs opened up after the lab received federal stimulus money to research energy-efficient buildings. Baker needs employees with backgrounds in city management and a grasp of the building codes needed to design energy-efficient buildings. Yet even a salary of $140,000 for senior researchers isn't drawing enough qualified applicants.
Baker said he's getting resumes from well-educated people, including some from information technology workers who want to enter the green-energy field. But he said it could take a year to get an unqualified employee up to speed on all the building codes they need to know.
"We're running out of people to train" new employees, he said. "We simply cannot attract enough (qualified) people."
The lab has hired a recruiter for the first time to fill dozens of positions. Rob Dromgoole, the recruiter, is going so far as to make cold calls to college professors. He's also visiting academic conferences to pitch jobs.
The trend has left jobseekers like Joe Sladek anxious and frustrated. Sladek's 23 years in the auto industry haven't helped his efforts to land a job in alternative energy since he was laid off a year ago.
As a quality control engineer for auto supplier Dura Automotive Systems Inc. in Mancelona, Mich., he made about $75,000. Sladek would review technical reports to make sure the factory's auto parts matched the specifications of clients like General Motors and Toyota.
He hoped to parlay that experience into a similar job at a factory making windmill blades or solar panels. Several factories were hiring, and Sladek landed a few interviews. But he never heard back.
At PricewaterhouseCoopers in Chicago, there's a shortage of qualified applicants for management jobs in tax services, auditing and consulting. Rod Adams, the company's recruiting leader, said huge pay packages on Wall Street siphoned off lots of business school graduates earlier this decade.
"That made our pipeline more scarce," he said.
Some of the openings at PricewaterhouseCoopers pay around $100,000 and don't even require graduate degrees – just specialized accounting certifications or other credentials.
Formerly successful bankers or hedge fund managers don't necessarily qualify.
"We've gotten a lot more resumes, but they haven't been the right people," Adams said.
Next: Top 10 Companies Hiring This Week >>
Find a Job
Search by Company | Search by IndustryAssociated Press reporters Christopher S. Rugaber in Washington and Mike Smith in Indianapolis contributed to this report.




Oct 5th 2009 @ 2:11PM Mitch
It's looking as though one day we will all be working in some medical facility or a Wal-Mart. If I had known this even 5 years ago I would have gone to nursing school. Then again, I never really wanted to be a nurse. My how times have changed.
Reply
Oct 5th 2009 @ 2:17PM M
But even nurses and medical asst,etc are having a very hard time attaining a job. Why? Because so many are out of work and the employers have more to pick from.
What I can't stand are the ones that you interview for, who keep you hanging. They don't inform you if you have been hired or not. Very unprofessional on their end.
Oct 6th 2009 @ 3:12PM firstamendment girl
Nursing is not a good field either. I have 20 years experience and have been looking for a job x 3 months. Unfortunately, hospitals and other employers want nurses with advanced degrees, but are not willing to pay enough to make it worth going back to school. For example, if I went back to school, it will cost me 25,000. My pay would only increase by 75 cents an hour. It would take me over 10 years to pay back a student loan and I would not come out ahead in the long run. I already figured out I would be better off by putting that same money into a money market account or IRA.
Oct 5th 2009 @ 5:26PM Susan
You made me laugh--how about comedians? I suppose in the future there could be drive by comedian shacks--you know, a daily laughslashinsight to go?
Don't listen to the trends
Best,
Susan M
Oct 5th 2009 @ 8:50PM pisces
you really dont want to work at Wal-Mart's, they really treat their employees like crap, especially if the store manager is very greedy, and not a people person
Oct 19th 2009 @ 12:30AM EAL
I can see everyone going under because of STUDENT LOANS. College costs way toomuch just like hospitals. As far as nursing for a job....YOU can have it.
Oct 5th 2009 @ 2:16PM gamay9
If employers were willing to hire highly experienced and older American's as consultants, part-time, they would find good matches. I'm a life-long auditor/financial consultant (operational, not series 7 or 22). i.e. I'm a 'buck smeller.'
I'm 67 and with my SS/state retirement there is no way I'll work for $12 per hour. I can be an acting CEO while the regular one is in rehab or prison. At my age, I possess the wisdom and character to run an organization.
That's what employers should be looking for. You not only get talent and wisdom/life experience, but don't have to pay fringe benefits.
Reply
Oct 5th 2009 @ 2:21PM M
That may explain why you won't get hired if you not willing to take less than $12 an hour. I would love to start at that! But it doesn't exist right now because employers are taking advantage of a situation knowing people need work and will take the lesser pay in order to have a job!
Oct 5th 2009 @ 3:28PM debloomslm
Doesn't matter what you think you're worth--it's how much an employer is willing to pay you.
Oct 5th 2009 @ 3:07PM Sandra
Thats good money in this day and age. My problem is everyones perception of 'age'. Every job I am 'highly' quialified for has an age limit, especially government jobs which cut at 37 or 38, I am 'only' 48, degreed, exspierenced, healthy, physically fit. As our retirement age has increased our employment attitudes havent changed to match. A Senator can be a Senator at 90 or better but an FBI Criminal Profiler cant get a job unless they are 37 or less, makes you think doesn't it?
Oct 5th 2009 @ 6:53PM Jim
I hear you, I worked at one company for 28 years before I was forced to retire, so I took other jobs as they came along and then one hiring manager had the nerve to say I had too many jobs in the past ten years, I was contracting.
There are jobs but employers don't want to pay a decent wage or benefits if they can help it.
Oct 8th 2009 @ 4:19AM Yon
True. But you have to meet the purchasing dep't instead of the word matching HR cogs. Another approach might be to promise to sue the company's deciders for damage to their stockholders, as they did not hire you and you went to work for the competition. Do I smell a lawfirm ?
Oct 5th 2009 @ 2:18PM Kathy
A lot of companies make it hard to get a job with all this red tape you have to go through. I understand background checks, but credit history, tests (that doesn't relate to the job you are applying for), how long is your resume, and a lot of companies discriminate on age and get away with it. There are two needs. A company needs someone to fill a job, and someone needs a job. Most companies use to take you right in and were more than happy to start training you for a job. There are a lot of good workers out there, but they can't get a job because of all the red tape. I would rather train someone on the job, and see if they can do it. That is the true test to me.
Reply
Oct 5th 2009 @ 2:38PM kymberlyc89
Kathy,
You are exactly right! I remember applying for the job I was just layed off from back in 1999 and had to fill out a credit check form, I thought this is ridiculous and an invasion of my privacy, I almost walked out. The man interviewing me said I agree but that's how it is now, you have the option not to fill it out but chances are they won't even look at your resume or consider you if you do not fill out the credit release form. I filled it out and did get the job but that was 10 yrs. ago and now things are even stricter so I understand what you mean about the red tape. The way I see it, you are there to apply for a job to pay your bills, get your career going, etc, etc..I understand and agree with the drug testing and background check but the credit check? Way too private if you ask me. You have to sit across from them every day knowing they know all about your credit history, what you owe, house payment, everything. But yet, we know nothing about the "higher ups" while they look down their noses at everyone else, what a joke. I'd love to take a gander at their credit..I was lucky my credit was good but what if it wasn't? They deny you a job because of it? That's the whole reason you are applying for their position, to make money to pay your bills!!! Instead they treat people like criminals..so sad..and they remain out of work because of it. Like a hamster on a wheel it seems...no end to the cycle. They should be more concerned about background and drug checks if you ask me. I've worked with some real winners and no way can you tell me these people weren't shady and didn't have something funky on their records...but yet, here they were. Go figure.
Oct 5th 2009 @ 5:57PM tammie
True that Kathly true thant.
Oct 5th 2009 @ 11:52PM Ms. Elena
So right on you are!! Us BABY BOOMERS haven't got a chance for sure. Oh, and if you're not Bilingual, that's another RED MARK against you.
Oct 5th 2009 @ 3:47PM Betsey
There are thousands of uemployed new grad RN's looking for jobs. Hospitals have cut new grad RN training programs. There is no great demand for RN's, just hopitals unwilling to provide the experience that they demand of new grad RN's. When the recession is over and experienced RN's retire, then there will be a HUGE demand for nurses. All the hospitals that post "New Grads do not apply" will be as despirate as we are now.
Reply
Oct 5th 2009 @ 5:41PM Oni
I feel your pain Betsy, I'm a NEW GRAD too. & yeah its pretty heart breaking when your looking for work and you see those words "New Grads do not apply"
Oct 5th 2009 @ 2:21PM Betsey
unemployed. opps ;)
Reply
Oct 5th 2009 @ 2:23PM nate
these aren't real jobs.. this is such bs and makes me sick... companies as well as government institutions post fake jobs to encourage stockholders and to try to instill confidence in the public.. This is total bs, if you believe any of this you need to get a reality check.
Reply